Discussion about this post

User's avatar
New Thinks's avatar

Inertia is important, but it isn't the only issue with wind and solar. You also need:

reactive power

system restart (black start)

scheduling and dispatch

loss compensation

load following

system protection

energy imbalance

And wind and solar struggle to provide any of these services. In fact, they use these services up rapidly, meaning you have to generate even more of these services to keep the grid humming. Big batteries and flywheel scan compensate, to a degree. But the amount of such deployments we'll need is staggering.

What happened in Spain and Portugal is exactly what people have been saying is going to start happening. Like all things wind and solar, it is happening exactly as the critics predicted, in exactly the same way critics predicted.

MISO has said the Midwest has been dangerous close to exactly this scenario, and one day they will fall off the cliff. https://www.misoenergy.org/meet-miso/MISO_Strategy/reliability-imperative/

“Reliably navigating the energy transition requires more than just having sufficient generating capacity; it also requires urgent action to avoid a looming shortage of broader system reliability attributes.”

“While wind and solar produce needed clean energy, they lack certain key reliability attributes that are needed to keep the grid reliable every hour of the year.”

Expand full comment
G Wilbur's avatar

Inertia reminds me of the car heater. In an ICE vehicle heat is a byproduct which we get for "free", whereas in an EV its a cost which has to be added.

In traditional generators, it seems "inertia" is part of the package. With inverter based systems it's another cost with added design complexity. For example, I recall the costing in one of your recent posts included a battery backup. I hadn't realized until now that it would also have to be distributed and certainly included 1+1 sparing.

Amazing😊

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts